Skip to content

fix:[CORE-1992] WIP#2308

Draft
santhosh-challa wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
feat/core-1992/jira-integration
Draft

fix:[CORE-1992] WIP#2308
santhosh-challa wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
feat/core-1992/jira-integration

Conversation

@santhosh-challa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@santhosh-challa santhosh-challa commented Jul 31, 2024 •
edited by coderabbitai Bot
Loading

Description

[CORE-1192] Draft changes.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced policy violation notifications by including new fields for policyId and severity.
    • Improved notification system to incorporate detailed information in generated notifications.

These updates will provide users with more context regarding policy violations and notifications, improving overall usability and reporting capabilities.

@santhosh-challa santhosh-challa marked this pull request as draft July 31, 2024 07:52
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 31, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The recent changes enhance the PolicyViolationNotificationRequest class by adding policyId and severity fields, enabling more detailed notifications regarding policy violations. In the NotificationUtils, the getNotificationBaseRequest method has been updated to include these new attributes, improving the notification's context. Overall, these adjustments aim to refine the notification system's functionality, making it more robust in handling policy-related information.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.../PolicyViolationNotificationRequest.java Added policyId and severity fields with corresponding getters and setters to enhance policy violation details.
.../NotificationUtils.java Updated getNotificationBaseRequest to include policyId and severity attributes from the annotation parameter, enhancing notification context and specificity.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Notify about policy violations with detailed attributes (CORE-1992) ✅
Ensure no role upgrades for Security Admin (CUS-212) ❌ No relevant changes regarding role upgrades.

🐰 In the code where changes bloom,
New fields added, dispelling gloom.
PolicyId and severity take flight,
Notifications now shine with more insight!
A system enriched, ready to play,
Hoppy updates brighten the day! 🌼✨

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai Bot reviewed Jul 31, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 87b317a and c5f241d.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • jobs/pacman-rule-engine-2.0/src/main/java/com/tmobile/pacman/dto/PolicyViolationNotificationRequest.java (2 hunks)
  • jobs/pacman-rule-engine-2.0/src/main/java/com/tmobile/pacman/util/NotificationUtils.java (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (7)
jobs/pacman-rule-engine-2.0/src/main/java/com/tmobile/pacman/dto/PolicyViolationNotificationRequest.java (6)

19-19: Field addition looks good.

The policyId field has been correctly added.

20-20: Field addition looks good.

The severity field has been correctly added.

110-112: Setter method addition looks good.

The setPolicyId method has been correctly added.

114-116: Getter method addition looks good.

The getPolicyId method has been correctly added.

118-120: Setter method addition looks good.

The setSeverity method has been correctly added.

122-124: Getter method addition looks good.

The getSeverity method has been correctly added.

jobs/pacman-rule-engine-2.0/src/main/java/com/tmobile/pacman/util/NotificationUtils.java (1)

89-90: Field setting looks good.

The policyId and severity fields are correctly set in the getNotificationBaseRequest method.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

sonarqubecloud Bot commented Jul 31, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
1 New issue
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] left review comments

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

Do-not-merge

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@santhosh-challa